| 
 Position 
Statement on Multi-State Licensure 
BACKGROUND 
In most areas of the United States of America, 
access to the specialized care, education and support for the person with Spinal 
Cord Impairment (SCI) is not available in the local community. The 
Patient-Consumer must travel to a medical center that specializes in the 
rehabilitation of this catastrophic insult. Advancements in telecommunication 
technologies using: computers, telephones, interactive video and other 
electronic devices, make it possible to bring personalized care to the 
patient-consumer. 
Currently, treatment for SCI is received at a 
rehabilitation center of specialization and excellence. The SCI Patient-Consumer 
is discharged home, often crossing a state line. The Registered Nurse, having 
provided the patient assessment, a specialized education, the implementation of 
care for altered functions and problem solving strategies is not legally 
permitted to answer SCI related questions for the patient, family, or 
caretakers. To be legally available to the patient with SCI, the Nurse must 
possess a Nursing License in the same state, in which the patient lives. State 
laws which were put into effect to protect the patient are in fact causing a 
disservice to the patient by preventing them from using currently available 
technological services which would increase the quality of their health care, 
decrease the personal cost of care and decrease the probability of 
complications. 
Most State Laws have not been updated to reflect 
the advancement in health care delivery. Patient-Consumers cross State Lines to 
receive care. Caregivers (Nurses) should be allowed to provide on-going 
consultation and care for these patients. 
A solution for this problem of appropriate care 
delivery is state adoption of a mutual recognition of Nursing Licenses; similar 
to a Driver ’s 
License. This allows the Nurse to follow patient care across State Lines. The 
AASCIN understands the concerns the States, Registered Nurses and Patients with 
SCI have about the model.
  - 
  
  The differences between the 
  individual State’s regulations.
    
  - 
  
  Will weaken the standards of some states?
    
  - 
  
  Will weaken the individual State Boards of 
  Nursing?   
  - 
  
  Will States lose revenue and have to raise 
  licenser fees?   
  - 
  
  The ability to maintain or improve 
  the protection of the public.   
  - 
  
  Will a state know who is practicing within its 
  borders?   
  - 
  
  The possibility of dual disciplinary 
  measures taken against a nurse by the state of licensure and/or the state of 
  practice.   
  - 
  
  Will there be an overwhelming inability for a 
  nurse to defend herself in one or more states?   
  - 
  
  Will this increase the burden of investigating 
  complaints against nurses? 
    
  - 
  
  The maintenance of a nationally 
  centralized database.
    
  - 
  
  Will confidentiality be maintained as it pertains 
  to a centralized database?   
  - 
  
  How will this be funded?
    
  - 
  
  The funding of the compact 
  administration   
 
The States Boards of Nursing are also aware of 
these and other problems associated with Nursing Licensing in multiple States. 
Their professional organization, the National Counsel for State Boards of 
Nursing (NCSBN) created a task force to study telehealth and licensure. They 
endorsed the concept of a mutual recognition model for the regulation of 
interstate licensure. 
In the Mutual Recognition Model the nurse is held 
accountable for the nursing practice laws and other regulations in the state 
where the nurse provides the services, while not being required to obtain a 
license, in states that join the compact. 
The AASCIN believes each state has the right to 
legislate the Scope of Nursing Practice within their borders. 
The AASCIN believes that the mutual recognition 
model does not circumvent the States rights but does in fact stimulate States to 
review their practice. 
The AASCIN believes that technologies such as the 
phone, computer and interactive video should be used to supply health care 
information, teaching materials and specialized nursing advice. 
The AASCIN believes that technologies such as the 
phone, computer and interactive video can be used to improve the quality of 
health care while reducing the cost of health care by preventing complications 
and unnecessary hospital admissions. 
The AASCIN feels that follow-up (for continuity of 
care or specialty information) via telephone, computer, and video should be 
allowed regardless of the care giver’s 
or patient’s state 
of residence. 
AASCIN supports multi-state licensure in order to 
provide persons with SCI impairments access to SCI specialty nursing they might 
otherwise not receive. 
AASCIN supports the opportunity multi-state 
licensure would provide a person with SCI to obtain education and services. 
The AASCIN endorses the concept of a mutual 
recognition model. 
References 
House Bill 1342 
– 
Bill Text 
  - "Nurse 
  Licensure Compact", 
  11-06-98 
 
  - 
  
  www.ncsbn.org/files/mutual/compact.asp
  
 
  -   
 
  - 
  "Nursing 
  Regulation for the New Millennium: The Mutual Recognition Model", 
  Carolyn Hutcherson, MS, RN and Susan H. Williamson, MPH, RN, 5-31-99,
  
 
  - 
  
  www.nursingworld.org/ojin/topic9/topic9_2.htm
  
 
  -   
 
  - 
  "The 
  Regulatory Dilemma Surrounding Interstate Practice", 
  Terri Gaffney, MPA, RN, 5-31-99, 
  
  www.nursingworld.org/ojin/topic9/topic9_1.htm
  
 
  -   
 
  - 
  "Position 
  Statement of American Nurses Association’s Board of Directors on the Nurse 
  Licensure Compact", 
  2-17-99 
 
  - NCSBN’s 
  FAQs, 
  
  www.ncsbn.org/files/mutual/mrfaq.asp
  
 
  -   
 
  - NCBSN’s 
  "Response to ANA House of Delegates Regarding Mutual Recognition and the 
  Interstate Compact", National Council Paper, 6-9-99 
 
  - 
  
  www.ncsbn.org/files/mutual/ana990609.asp
  
 
  -   
 
  - 
  NCSBN, 
  "Continuum of Models for 
  Regulating Multistate Nursing Practice"
  
 
  - "Telepractice 
  and Professional Licensing: A Guide for Legislators"
  
 
  - 
  
  www.clearhq.org/teleguide.htm.
  
 
  -   
 
  - "Multistate 
  Licensure: Premature Policy", Susan E. King, MS RN, 5-31-99, 
  
 
  - 
  
  www.nursingworld.org/ojin/topic9/topic9_3.htm
  
 
  -   
 
  - 
  "1999 
  State Legislative Trends", 
  APRN, 5-17-99 
 
  - 
  
  www.nursingworld.org/gova/state/hod99/aprn.htm
  
 
  -   
 
  - 
  "ANA 
  Response to Pew Commission Report"
  
 
  - 
  
  www.nursingworld.org/readroom/pew.htm
  
 
  -   
 
  - 
  "An 
  Overview of State Laws and Approaches to Minimize Licensure Barriers", 
  Linda Gobis, RN, FNP, JD 
 
  - 
  
  www.telemedtoday.com/mainpages/statelaw.htm
  
 
  -   
 
  - 
  ANA Policy Series: 
  "Telehealth -- Issues for 
  Nursing", 
  10-09-96 
 
  - 
  
  www.nursingworld.org/readroom/tele2.htm
  
 
  -   
 
  - 
  "ANA 
  Multistate Regulation of Nurses - Backgrounder", 
  June 24, 1998 
 
  - 
  
  www.nursingworld.org/gova/multibg.htm
  
 
 
(Approved 12/2000)  |